Determining the Level and Scope of Design Management Services in the Project Management Process

On this page

Introduction

Note: This document is intended for all personnel who provide a design management or project management function in the management of real property projects in the National Capital Area. Other regions have similar processes.

The growing pressure to better manage 'quality' on Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) real property projects has necessitated a need for the consistent inclusion of the design management function within the project team structure and a more clearly defined design management process in the delivery process.

Project management involves the planning, design, coordination and implementation of activities to achieve a specific, planned quality product within a specified time period and established budget (Project Management Body of Knowledge 'PMBOK®'). The management of real property projects within this framework requires the participation of several stakeholders. Project managers (PM) cannot consistently include the design management function nor the wide range of specialist resources available to them on their project teams without a predefined process to determine the number, mix and level of design management services and resources required based on project scope, complexity, priority and sensitivity.

Design management is a broad and comprehensive service function that includes quality assurance services and requires a clear understanding of project objectives and constraints. It is a collaborative role providing strategic and technical advice to PM's in the development and delivery of projects while ensuring the design services related to the project are of a level and quality that meet the expectations of all stakeholders throughout all phases of the project. Any number of individuals will be involved in design management regardless of their position titles. Personal attributes, technical skills and experience in relation to the project at hand, as well as the constraints of available resources will determine whether an individual will be assigned to a lead design management role. The scope of design management services varies from project to project depending on its associated risks.

The Real Property Branch (RPB) has adopted a new process to provide for a more consistent integration and application of the design management role in project management. This process assists in the allocation of the available discipline resources (as effectively as possible) to ensure that each project team is provided with the optimum number, mix and level of professional and technical expertise to ensure all project-related design services are of a level and quality that meet with stakeholders expectations. The key activities in the process are:

Guidelines for Determining the Level of Design Management Services

Introduction

This guideline assists the PM in determining the design management level of service based on a project risk assessment. All projects shall be individually assessed and assigned a design management level of 4, 3, 2 or 1. Levels 4, 3 and 2 require the assignment of a design manager (DM) to assist in establishing the scope of design management services. The Design Manager is responsible for coordinating various discipline activities on behalf of the PM. These activities typically include but are not limited to architectural, engineering, commissioning, environmental health and safety and accessibility reviews. The coordination of Integrated Support Centre services and the scope of work agreements for all external services are the responsibility of the PM.

Risk Factors

Occasionally, the risk filters identified below will not capture all risk conditions and therefore judgment (using risk management principles) is required in determining the appropriate level of design management. Each risk factor can be identified as having low, medium or high impact, subsequently a collective assessment can be completed examining the following factors:

Risk Filters for Design Management Levels

To ensure the most effective use of discipline resources, four levels of design management services have been established. The determination of 'level' can be influenced by any single factor noted and cost may not be the determining factor.

Level 4 - Dedicated Design Management Services

This level would be considered for a major project such as the Library of Parliament, the Portrait Gallery, Bank Street Building, Judicial Court,etc. The project would also be reviewed by the National/Regional Design Review Committee. Assignment of a Design Manager is required at the initiation of the project with the full scope of design management services. The project would be the Design Manager's primary responsibility on a day to day basis. The Design Manager, supported by a resource team representing the other disciplines, would be a key member of the overall project team and develop a close working relationship with the consultant team. The agreement with the PM would be signed off by both the PM and the Design Manager. Projects within this level typically:

Level 3 - Full Scope or Selected Design Management Services

This level is for projects that call for design management involvement in the project planning, definition and implementation phases because of high risk, large construction costs, uncertainties surrounding cost or schedule, or challenging sensitivities. The project may involve: clarification of client needs, detailed and thorough challenge of cost and schedule, site development and design parameters, incorporation of special initiatives, consideration for technological innovation, or may be any project that is not clearly defined at the outset. Assignment of a Design Manager is required at the project planning phase with an established scope of design management services. Design management services may be full scope or as selected by the PM in consultation with the discipline managers. Projects within this level typically:

Level 2 - Limited Design Management Services

This level is reserved for projects with limited scope that are well defined from the outset and for which the design parameters and possible options are limited. The risks identified are medium to low, that is, low impact with medium probability or medium impacts with low probability. The construction costs are average and there are no unusual sensitivities. Quality assurance reviews are performed to ensure compliance between the design solution and the project brief and compliance with PSPC policies and guidelines. The Design Manager is engaged throughout the definition and implementation phases to provide selected services. Reviews of consultant work are performed to ensure compliance with the selected design solution. These projects typically:

Level 1 - No Design Management Services

This level is reserved for projects that have minimal risks, low construction cost and no other sensitivities. Quality assurance is due diligence carried out by the PM who may call upon discipline resources to answer technical questions in relation to specific issues in a timely manner. These can be in any phase of the National Project Management System (NPMS) but this level, by definition, implies no ongoing quality assurance responsibility by the discipline resources. No assignment of a Design Manager is required. The design management function is provided by the PM. The PM shall call upon specific discipline expertise to answer technical questions in relation to specific issues in a timely manner (see "Use of Discipline Expertise"). The PM ensures plans and specifications are reviewed as required for compliance with all applicable laws and regulations and a 99% "document check" is completed to establish "bidability" and "constructability". Projects within this level typically:

Design Management Roles and Responsibilities

Level 3 or 4

Project Planning Phase

Outputs - Service Agreement, review of the Investment and Analysis Report, project charter, preplanning studies, and recommendations for design implementation

Project definition phase

Outputs - review of project brief, consultant agreement, basic outline of functional requirements

Design Phase

Implementation Phase

Outputs - Quality assurance design review forms

Close-out

Outputs - lessons learned, final project documents

Level 2

Project definition phase

Outputs - Service agreement, review of project brief, consultant agreement, basic outline of functional requirements

Design Phase

Implementation Phase

Outputs - Quality assurance design review forms

Forms, samples and checklists

Date modified: