Public Services and Procurement Canada
Annex A: Assessment of internal controls over financial management for year ended March 31, 2019

On this page

1. Introduction

This document provides a summary of measures taken by Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSPC) to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial management (ICFM), which includes information on internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), assessment results and related action plans.

Detailed information on the department's authority, mandate and program activities can be found in its most recent Departmental Plan and Departmental Results Report.

2. Departmental system of internal control over financial management

2.1 Internal control management

PSPC has a well-established governance and accountability structure to support departmental assessment efforts and oversight of its system of internal control. This structure is formalized in the Departmental Internal Control Framework, which includes:

The DAC provides advice to the deputy head on the adequacy and functioning of the department's risk management, control and governance frameworks and processes. It meets approximately 5 times a year, and is comprised of the Deputy Minister, the associate deputy minister and the 4 members external to the federal public administration, one of whom is the chair. Its meetings are also attended by the chief financial officer.

To provide reasonable assurance that financial controls are in place and operating as intended and adequately, PSPC conducts risk-based assessments, leverages ongoing monitoring programs and conducts specific year-end reviews, including:

These activities help ensure that:

In addition, PSPC leverages results and findings from audits performed by external auditors, and the Office of Audit and Evaluation, as input in its assessments of the control environment, as follows:

2.2 Service arrangements relevant to financial statements

PSPC relies on other organizations for processing certain transactions that are recorded in its financial statements as follows:

Common service arrangements

PSPC provides common services to other organizations for processing certain transactions that are recorded in their financial statements. In addition, PSPC relies on services provided by other organizations:

Readers of this annex may refer to the annexes of the above-noted organizations for a greater understanding of the systems of internal control over financial reporting related to these specific services.

PSPC provides common services, in the areas of procurement, accommodation, contract security, and translation, as well as pay and pension administration to other federal government departments, agencies and public service pensioners. In addition, the Receiver General for Canada administers several systems on behalf of the Government of Canada, including: Standard Payment System, Payroll System-General Ledger, and Receiver General-General Ledger.

Specific arrangements

PSPC relies on other external service providers for the processing of certain transactions or information that are recorded in its financial statements, as follows:

3. Departmental assessment results for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019

PSPC's ongoing financial control monitoring program assesses, on a cyclical basis, the state of key financial control processes performed by PSPC's Finance Administration Branch, and the financial control activities conducted directly by branches delivering programs. This combined approach leads to a more robust and holistic view of the department's overall financial control environment and further supports assertions made in the Statement of Management Responsibility.

For the mature processes and sub-processes, testing is conducted on a 4 year cycle. Annually, a risk assessment of the business processes for key financial reporting controls is performed, which indicates if there is a residual risk of material misstatement. This risk-based approach supports PSPC's decisions as to the scope and extent of operational effectiveness testing that is required. In the current fiscal year, efforts were concentrated on sub-processes for which a medium or high risk of material misstatement was assessed, prior to controls or mitigation strategies.

As part of ongoing monitoring, sub-processes documentation is reviewed, and design effectiveness and operations effectiveness testing is conducted on select key controls. In addition to the ongoing monitoring of the financial controls processes, and operating effectiveness testing, corroborative procedures are performed in all of the control environments to obtain sufficient reliable evidence to support PSPC's assertion that the financial control environment in place is sound.

3.1 Mature business processes

The following table summarizes the progress of the ongoing monitoring activities performed as part of the internal control review of mature business processes, for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019. This review is consistent with the previous year's rotational plan.

Table 1: Ongoing monitoring activities of mature business processes
Key control areas Number of sub-processes Number of sub-processes tested Remedial action required
Internal control over financial reporting
Entity level controls 5 5 Yes
Information technology general controls 10 3 Yes
Sales to settlement 12 1 Yes
Procurement to payment 13 2 Yes
Departmental payroll 13 3 Yes
Capital assets and capital leases 11 2 Yes
Other significant financial statements items 8 2 Yes
Year-end financial close and financial statement presentation 8 2 Yes
Common services
Pension servicestable 1 note 1 39 29 Yes
Receiver general services To be determined 4 Yes
Translation services 3 3 Yes
Contract security services 2 1 Yes
Other common servicestable 1 note 2 To be determined 0 Nil

Table 1: Ongoing monitoring activities of mature business processes notes: Table 1 Notes

Table 1 Note 1

The pension services include 3 distinct plans as follows: the Public Service Pension Plan, Canadian Armed Forces Pension Plan and Royal Canadian Mounted Police Pension Plan.

Return to table 1 note 1 referrer

Table 1 Note 2

Although procurement and accommodation are considered mature processes, they were not assessed during the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, but will be part of the ongoing monitoring plan.

Return to table 1 note 2 referrer

Remedial action summary

As a result of design and operating effectiveness testing of key controls for mature business processes reviewed, no significant control deficiencies, which would expose the department to an elevated risk of material misstatement of its financial statements, have been identified. There are, however, areas that continue to require remediation:

3.2 New business processes

Consistent with the requirements of the April 1, 2017 Treasury Board Policy on Financial Management, PSPC adds several areas of review due to their significance on the financial management of the department or that of other departments in which PSPC has a role as a common service provider.

Table 2: Ongoing monitoring activities of new business processes
Key control areas Number of sub-processes Number of sub-processes tested Remedial action required
Other significant financial management control areas
Planning To be determined 1 Yes
Budgeting To be determined 1 Yes
Forecasting To be determined 1 Yes
Integrated investment plan 5 1 Yes
Common services
Pay administration services To be determined 2 Yes

Summary of work performed and results

The planning, budgeting, forecasting and Integrated Investment Plan processes are currently in the early stages of review, which to date has involved the formal documentation of certain sub-processes and the assessment of the design effectiveness of their key controls.

PSPC is leading a significant effort to address and resolve pay issues. Progress is ongoing as it continues to work closely with other departments, central agencies, bargaining units and stakeholders. Given the current context, the departmental payroll process has been enhanced to address the challenges of reporting pay expenditures resulting from Phoenix Pay Systemissues, PSPC implements significant additional internal controls, such as:

As a result of the assessment of the new business processes, the following remedial actions have been identified:

4. Departmental action plan for next fiscal year and subsequent years

4.1 Ongoing monitoring for mature business processes internal control reviews

For the fiscal year ending March 31, 2020, cyclical reviews of mature internal control processes will continue, along with ongoing improvement of internal controls assessment methodology for enhanced effectiveness and greening of operations. The approach leverages risk-based assessments to identify best mitigation strategies and internal control testing techniques for greater cost efficiency and assurance.

Furthermore, remediation strategies identified in management action plans for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2019 will continue to be monitored.

4.2 Other significant financial management processes

The plan for the assessment of the other significant financial management processes will be determined after a risk-based assessment is completed. The current 4 year plan is as follows:

Table 3: Other significant financial management processes planning
Key control areas Planning and documentation
Fiscal year ending March 31
Design effectiveness testing and remediation
Fiscal year ending March 31
Operational effectiveness testing and remediation
Fiscal year ending March 31
Ongoing monitoring rotationtable 2 note 1
Future years
Budgeting 2020 2020 2021 2022
Forecasting 2020 2020 2022 2023
Investment planning 2020 2020 2020 2023
Costing To be determined To be determined To be determined To be determined
Cabinet submissions To be determined To be determined To be determined To be determined
Financial reporting 2020 2020 2021 2023
Chief financial officer attestation To be determined To be determined To be determined To be determined

Table 3: Other significant financial management processes planning: Table 2 Notes

Table 2 Note 1

The frequency of the ongoing monitoring of key control areas is risk-based and may occur over a multi-year cycle.

Return to table 2 note 1 referrer

4.3 Common service processes

As a common service provider of pay, pension, treasury, banking, procurement, translation and interpretation, accommodations and security in contracting, PSPC completes annually a risk-based assessment of the internal controls related to some of these services. The results of the assessment of certain sub-processes within the Pay Administration services are provided in sections 3.1 and 3.2.

The action plan for this annual assessment for the next and subsequent years is detailed below.

Table 4: Common service processes planning
Key control areastable 3 note 2 Planning and documentation
Fiscal year ending March 31
Design effectiveness testing and remediation
Fiscal year ending March 31
Operational effectiveness testing and remediation
Fiscal year ending March 31
Ongoing monitoring rotationtable 3 note 1
Future years
Pension services No planned assessment No planned assessment 2020 Annual
Pay administration servicestable 3 note 3 2020 2020 2020 Annual
Receiver general 2020 2020 2020 Annual
Procurement 2020 and 2021 2020 To be determined To be determined
Contract security No planned assessment No planned assessment 2020 2024
Accommodations 2021 or 2022 2021or 2022 To be determined To be determined

Table 4: Common service processes planning : Table 3 Notes

Table 3 Note 1

The frequency of the ongoing monitoring of key control areas is risk-based and may occur over a multi-year cycle.

Return to table 3 note 1 referrer

Table 3 Note 2

All key control areas will include a review of ITGCs when applicable.

Return to table 3 note 2 referrer

Table 3 Note 3

Each year, as new pay administration processes become stabilized, they will be added to the review process.

Return to table 3 note 3 referrer

Date modified: